False pretences

Data visualisation software with packaged solutions for data graphing are designed to enable fast effortless creation of graphs. Search for “Data visualisation software” and you will see plenty of examples, some more well-known than others. This is their value proposition – to spit out data graphs without much prior thought from the user. This functionality may be desirable by those who need fast off-the-cuff reports but it is certainly not the way to go for analysing complex multidimensional data. Of course, these software offer more advanced features, but I do not agree with their list of defaults on the basis of the identified data properties.

In fact, I find this offering of default graphs to be false pretense on behalf of these software. They give a misleading sense of proficiency. Do not be fooled by how quickly you can graph data using such software. You, the designer, must conceptualise the graph beforehand, either by having a mental image of want you to achieve or, even better, by having several competing forms.

Consider the words of Andrew Gelman (Columbia University), one of the most prominent statisticians of our time:

Writing takes thought. You can’t just plug your results into a computer program and hope to have readable, useful paragraphs. Similarly, graphics takes thought. You can’t just plug your results into a graphics program and hope to have readable, useful graphs

As with any statistical estimator, also with a data graph estimator it holds that the design must be informed by certain principles and standards for evaluating accuracy in estimation. I collect these principles as qualities of data graphs.

Pen and paper

Although it is understandable for novices to rely on software to make graphs at first, over time and with plenty of practice you will learn that packaged solutions are quite limited in their offerings.

The greatest data graphs of all time have nearly always begun with a pen and a piece of paper or at least a mental image thereof (image courtesy of WikiHow):

This is how I design every new form of graph. I use the Graph Workflow model as a guide for drawing some doodles, which I translate into visual implantations and retinal variables. Starting with pen and paper certainly helps think out-of-the-box and design graphs with novel features. Some examples are provided in the homepage of Graph Workflow.


Back to Information system ⟵ ⟶ Continue to Graph objective

Demetris Christodoulou